cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tyler Hobbs <ty...@datastax.com>
Subject Re: SSTable generation numbers
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:01:31 GMT
32 bit integer overflow is the only scenario where a single node would wrap
around.

However, when copying sstables from one node to another, there can easily
be conflicts, so this is something to be careful about.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Rajath Subramanyam <rajath26@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Cassandra-dev,
>
> Are there any scenarios in which the generation numbers of SSTables (i.e.
> ksname-cfname-<gen_num>-Data.db) can wrap around, without the admin
> dropping and re-creating the CF with the same name ?
>
> I believe that the answer must be version-agnostic, but in case it matters,
> I am specifically asking this question for C* 2.0/2.1.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> - Rajath
> ------------------------
> Rajath Subramanyam
>



-- 
Tyler Hobbs
DataStax <http://datastax.com/>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message