cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajath Subramanyam <rajat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SSTable generation numbers
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:17:05 GMT
Thanks Tyler.

- Rajath

------------------------
Rajath Subramanyam


On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Tyler Hobbs <tyler@datastax.com> wrote:

> 32 bit integer overflow is the only scenario where a single node would wrap
> around.
>
> However, when copying sstables from one node to another, there can easily
> be conflicts, so this is something to be careful about.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Rajath Subramanyam <rajath26@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Cassandra-dev,
> >
> > Are there any scenarios in which the generation numbers of SSTables (i.e.
> > ksname-cfname-<gen_num>-Data.db) can wrap around, without the admin
> > dropping and re-creating the CF with the same name ?
> >
> > I believe that the answer must be version-agnostic, but in case it
> matters,
> > I am specifically asking this question for C* 2.0/2.1.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your help.
> >
> > - Rajath
> > ------------------------
> > Rajath Subramanyam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tyler Hobbs
> DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message