cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Telford <>
Subject Re: Cassandra documentation (and in this case the datastax anti-entropy docs)
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:27:50 GMT
I agree that wikis are great for contribution; what I meant was that they're
rather poor at organising information for ease of discovery, especially by
new users.

I still like the idea of some more structured docs being managed by the
community though.

On 1 April 2011 02:16, Eric Evans <> wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:57 +0100, Nick Telford wrote:
> > I don't think the Wiki is the right place for community maintained
> > user docs; it doesn't have the necessary structure.
> The wiki is great at what wikis are great at, lowering the barrier to
> contribution.  There is a lot of good stuff (some of it is even
> translated to other languages!); I'm guessing there would be much less
> if people had to jump through more hoops.
> > Perhaps some generated docs maintained in-tree and hosted somewhere on
> > might be an idea? This would also enforce some
> > order over changes made to them as changes would be controlled by
> > committers and managed through JIRA.
> I had this exact idea, I even checked the CQL language documentation
> into the tree as doc/cql/CQL.textile.  I had expected that to either set
> a precedent, or to be told to get it out of there, but neither
> happened. :)
> I don't think we need to choose one or the other.  If someone would
> rather add documentation to the wiki, we should let them (thank them
> even).  People interested in something maintained with more rigor can
> invite the wiki peeps to submit patches, and steal their content if they
> won't!
> --
> Eric Evans

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message