Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46426 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 19:50:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 19:50:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 23440 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 19:50:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 23384 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 19:50:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 23376 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 19:50:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:50:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.192.241.151] (HELO smtp151.dfw.emailsrvr.com) (67.192.241.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:50:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9DD0458684 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:49:41 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: eevans-AT-racklabs.com) with ESMTPSA id 7AB7A58625 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:49:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Proposal: fixed release schedule From: Eric Evans To: dev@cassandra.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <1295032303.32754.156.camel@erebus.lan> <1295375775.27020.31.camel@erebus.lan> <1295541569.23628.34.camel@erebus.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:52:25 -0600 Message-ID: <1295553145.23628.38.camel@erebus.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:19 -0800, Ryan King wrote: > Seems reasonable to me, though I think the release date can be a bit > more flexible (while the freeze date shouldn't be). In other words, if > we feature freeze and branch on April 9th, then we're ready to ship > before May 9th, we should just go ahead and ship. I'm more worried about the inverse (the date slipping because of bugs), but sure. > I'm guessing that we'll have to cut a bunch of scope in order to make > this happen. Yes. -- Eric Evans eevans@rackspace.com