Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96025 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 17:09:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 17:09:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 82749 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 17:09:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 82721 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 17:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 82705 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 17:09:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:09:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.44] (HELO mail-vw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.212.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:09:32 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2137252vws.31 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:09:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.207 with SMTP id cl15mr6344275qcb.33.1293037750319; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:09:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.63.69 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:09:10 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [64.132.24.248] In-Reply-To: <1293037253.11611.85.camel@erebus.lan> References: <1293037253.11611.85.camel@erebus.lan> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:09:10 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Avro RPC? From: Nate McCall To: client-dev@cassandra.apache.org Cc: dev@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We encapsulated the transport in Hector a while ago, stubbing out the avro stuff when we did. Fwiw, we have yet to receive a single request for building it out. Implementing a different approach like CQL is far more compelling to me than maintaining two transports that are more or less feature matched at this point. On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > So, Avro RPC. =A0Is anyone using this? =A0Is there anyone interested in > seeing it maintained? > > I'm concentrating on CQL[1][2], which for me will culminate in the > creation of a new, application-specific transport, one that doesn't use > either of the frameworks. =A0To me, the existing RPC framework is just > something to piggy-back on until things are otherwise working, and I'm > starting to think Thrift might be a better piggy here (read: it has more > momentum). > > TTBMK, the Avro RPC interface seems to be "mostly" working at present, > but it's already looking a bit like the proverbial red headed stepchild. > Or am I wrong and there are people who care deeply about this? > > > [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.devel/2370 > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1703 > > -- > Eric Evans > eevans@rackspace.com > >