Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67204 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2010 16:17:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Dec 2010 16:17:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 89786 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2010 16:17:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 89644 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2010 16:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 89636 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2010 16:17:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:17:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.192.241.201] (HELO smtp201.dfw.emailsrvr.com) (67.192.241.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:17:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp20.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DE416258B71 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:17:06 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp20.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: eevans-AT-racklabs.com) with ESMTPSA id 18A0D258B81 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:16:56 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Any chance of getting cassandra releases published to repo1.maven.org? From: Eric Evans To: dev@cassandra.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <1292211622.7542.564.camel@erebus.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:19:04 -0600 Message-ID: <1292257144.7542.568.camel@erebus.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 05:19 +0000, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Are official releases made from svn or from git? svn > And how exactly do you run your release process? E.g. do you cut the > tag and run from the tag, or do you run the build from trunk and then > make the tag? I'm hoping the first as it will make generating the pom > easier (as the pom is supposed to have the scm section for the build > origin, but I can always just use a peg revision on trunk if you cut > builds direct from trunk and tag after the fact) The releases artifacts are cut from the branch. I make note of the revision and tag based on that if/when the vote passes. -- Eric Evans eevans@rackspace.com