Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55405 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2010 06:48:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2010 06:48:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2544 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 06:48:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 2364 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 06:48:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 2356 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2010 06:48:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:48:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dragos.cernahoschi@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.44] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.214.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:48:47 +0000 Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so5150024bwz.31 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:48:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=O6OuxoBWJGlX5V0R7P+/u/jqYqkx7Rdb//LtqQ0iqTM=; b=r4YYgJ7a5JOt9LjKERuO5YPhyJivQSw/tdxAJmpgaHTMu9dfNdiFus5OLQTpY6wyFW XHlk4R854Etw/Dacb1RMkCeenWIbvYe5FsRz+NPWxMK7TJppxaxqcjkImmIzrjCMpYU2 Rh+d7cqymuVO0FJD1WuTmc6WKd7wYzGKXXZLc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XPPT16QwOXT8cyZX1SGwlNf2rQl7HGMDi+PjSZVCcGVhCvgeyYUu5p095GzRrAj/+0 ds0b6h3QllUP432aZx6AWJhItTK6jCRLW/TiTAD47SyMPoXiXGcLCBECfW7nYmtrlwhY uI76SS6Gi5HoXwxjwkBm0lsYAbPfnrVuFWoRA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.100.66 with SMTP id x2mr372202bkn.56.1289717305600; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.113.5 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:48:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.113.5 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:48:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1289234576.46236761@192.168.2.228> <1289317896.180116986@192.168.2.228> <1289320161.063728937@192.168.2.228> <1289325924.168626883@192.168.2.228> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:48:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CASSANDRA-1472 (bitmap indexes) From: dragos cernahoschi To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7bf4cdc6a550494fdb515 --001485f7bf4cdc6a550494fdb515 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No problem. I'll do the test on Monday. On Nov 14, 2010 2:35 AM, "Stu Hood" wrote: > Is it worth testing 0.7-branch-without-1472 to make sure of that? Dragos: if you have time, this would be helpful. If you already have a KEYS index created, you shouldn't need to re-load the data, as the file format hasn't changed. Thanks, Stu On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Is it worth testing 0... --001485f7bf4cdc6a550494fdb515--