Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35814 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2010 20:14:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Jul 2010 20:14:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 84369 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2010 20:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-dev-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 84298 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2010 20:14:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 84290 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2010 20:14:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:14:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stuhood@mailtrust.com designates 207.97.245.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.97.245.231] (HELO smtp231.iad.emailsrvr.com) (207.97.245.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:14:04 +0000 Received: from relay13.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CF55E1D6154 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dynamic4.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com (dynamic4.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com [192.168.2.153]) by relay13.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B69C41D6153 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailtrust.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dynamic4.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF311D48073 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: stuhood@mailtrust.com, from: stu.hood@rackspace.com) with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:=20Almost=20time=20for=200.7=20beta=3F?= From: "Stu Hood" To: dev@cassandra.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: plain In-Reply-To: <460EB885-8787-46D0-B14F-D7DBD05CA6A6@chrisgoffinet.com> References: <460EB885-8787-46D0-B14F-D7DBD05CA6A6@chrisgoffinet.com> Message-ID: <1280088823.588210836@192.168.2.229> X-Mailer: webmail8 The are a few tickets affecting the public API that Rackspace would really = like to see make it into the 0.7-beta, since they will be very difficult to= apply once a mass of people have gone through the readTablesFromYaml proce= ss.=0A=0AIn particular, we'd like to see 1066, 1237 and the portion of 1271= modifying AccessLevel block 0.7-beta, but we're fairly certain these can b= e knocked out this week.=0A=0AThanks,=0AStu=0A=0A-----Original Message-----= =0AFrom: "Chris Goffinet" =0ASent: Saturday, July 24,= 2010 9:56pm=0ATo: dev@cassandra.apache.org=0ACc: cassandra-dev@incubator.a= pache.org=0ASubject: Re: Almost time for 0.7 beta?=0A=0A+1. Digg has been h= olding off until at least beta before testing. I'd love to start this as so= on as possible.=0A=0A-Chris=0A=0AOn Jul 24, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Jonathan Elli= s wrote:=0A=0A> At the time of our last update [1], I estimated it would be= 4 to 6=0A> weeks until a 0.7 beta. That was over 8 weeks ago. Although w= e've=0A> never adhered to a strict release schedule, I'm feeling more and m= ore=0A> like we need to stop delaying getting what is already done into=0A>= peoples' hands.=0A> =0A> Wide row support was the main "blocker" in my min= d for 0.7, and that=0A> was complete a month ago. [2] Basic secondary inde= x support will be=0A> also be done in the next few days (see subtasks to [3= ]). I propose=0A> rolling a beta release next Friday and a release candida= te two weeks=0A> after that; anything not ready at that point can wait unti= l 0.7.1 or=0A> 0.8.=0A> =0A> The bad news is, vector clocks [4] and the Avr= o client api [5] will=0A> probably not be ready for the beta but may be rea= dy for the release=0A> candidate. I would be okay putting those directly i= nto the RC since=0A> they are completely optional and will not affect users= who want to=0A> ignore them. (That is, more than they already have, with = the Clock=0A> struct in the Thrift API.) But I don't want to slip the sche= dule any=0A> more to wait for them.=0A> =0A> [1] http://www.mail-archive.co= m/dev@cassandra.apache.org/msg00404.html=0A> [2] https://issues.apache.org/= jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16=0A> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASS= ANDRA-749=0A> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-580=0A> [= 5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-926=0A> =0A> -- =0A> Jon= athan Ellis=0A> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra=0A> co-founder of Riptano, = the source for professional Cassandra support=0A> http://riptano.com=0A=0A