Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79940 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2010 23:26:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2010 23:26:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 57114 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 23:26:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57088 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 23:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57078 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2010 23:26:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:26:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [38.102.63.181] (HELO smtp-2.01.com) (38.102.63.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:26:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCC41AE004 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:26:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp-2.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XqZ5Wk0zHWuc for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:26:28 -0600 (CST) Received: by smtp-2.01.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8F3EA1AD53B; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:26:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.122] (cpe-70-112-179-175.austin.res.rr.com [70.112.179.175]) by smtp-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF06B1AD4A2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:26:27 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4B7C7B20.9040705@fourkitchens.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:26:24 +0000 From: David Strauss Organization: Four Kitchens User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: 0.6, 0.7, and the future References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF125FAB60AAACD318B00E0AC" --------------enigF125FAB60AAACD318B00E0AC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2010-02-17 21:32, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > So what I'd like to propose is making 0.7 primarily about the > internals changes and push for high-level queries in 0.8, where both > of those hit our usual ~3 month release cycle. I don't think it makes > sense to do those the other way around; introducing new APIs that we > already know we need to break just seems mean. :) How dependent are the 0.8 high-level queries on the 0.7 internal changes?= --=20 David Strauss | david@fourkitchens.com Four Kitchens | http://fourkitchens.com | +1 512 454 6659 [office] | +1 512 870 8453 [direct] --------------enigF125FAB60AAACD318B00E0AC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkt8eyIACgkQZ52GCE5ilTOlwwCfRV+vBlWaeENIgiHIfL6dVRM/ ThcAmQHvxrQ8grIYaATBGcj4hu0Q/e5J =F9yJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF125FAB60AAACD318B00E0AC--