Mailing-List: contact cassandra-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.223 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=QI1eVbWvAF7TteqZWmo0cFvpjItyfqIYPVWb5BEWJZK8UyMkNIkhpVZUJaEA1Rwf99
         nm6ojun1wEOwFfawOuYapuPqSECMgzyDlOFd4g0hLb/xCl4dkogAq7TPp7vareutcpDo
         3Rma3YPJb2ERVR2eFUfKB9A3LV8NsHMHXe908=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e06563880906240828r61ca8501x93ff46f7c6683cd8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e06563880906240828r61ca8501x93ff46f7c6683cd8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:29:40 -0500
Message-ID: <e06563880906240829w7a199c0fg16a78dcad505ae9f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Time to move to (ASF-sanctioned) git?
From: Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com>
To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Forgot my footnotes. :)

[1] http://spyced.blogspot.com/2009/06/patch-oriented-development-made-sane=
.html
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/2vtyrx56jwsloxhn
[3] http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis<jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yesterday I posted about my git-svn workflow [1]. =A0What I didn't
> expect was that a member of ASF infrastructure who is setting up a
> pilot project [2] based on git + gerrit [3] instead of svn + jira
> asked if we'd be interested in helping test it out.
>
> They are setting it up so it will still push changes back to svn so we
> can always go back to svn if it doesn't work out.
>
> At first I was totally enthusiastic, but then I realized that if it
> works out, we can move to it later and let someone _else_ shake out
> the bugs first. :)
>
> But if we move now then we don't have to deal with jira awfulness that
> much sooner.
>
> So I would be +0 (mildly in favor).
>
> -Jonathan
>