cassandra-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <>
Subject Re: Random Checkins
Date Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:51:14 GMT
I'm curious -- what kind of memory overhead were you seeing on
ConcurrentHashMap? I just wrote a quick test program and it seems to be
slightly less memory-efficient than straight HashMap, but only a few


On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Avinash Lakshman <
> wrote:

> Another issue with ConcurrentHashMap is that the dude is a memory hog. We
> got rid of it over a year ago because of the very same reason. Also for
> everything that is done there is a reason. I think we are not asking for
> much to apart from run it by someone before what are basically changes that
> suit your style. There is a reason why something is done the way it is - we
> have been at this for over a year and half. I understand the community
> business but it has to be established that random changes need to be under
> check. At this rate everyone can just go trigger happy w/o any process in
> place. It is important that this is realized.
> Avinash
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Avinash Lakshman <
> > wrote:
> > Compactions etc are breaking now in our tests. I am going to revert all
> new
> > commits that have gone in. Are you sure these are tested changes? We need
> to
> > have a review process for changing code that is functioning. This is very
> > very frustrating.
> >
> > Avinash
> >

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message