cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "xin jin (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Created] (CASSANDRA-13904) Performance improvement of Cassandra UDF/UDA
Date Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:33:00 GMT
xin jin created CASSANDRA-13904:

             Summary: Performance improvement of Cassandra UDF/UDA
                 Key: CASSANDRA-13904
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: CQL
            Reporter: xin jin
            Priority: Critical
             Fix For: 3.11.x

Hi All,

We have made a few experiments and found that running query with direct UDF execution is ten
time more faster than the async UDF execution. The in-line comment: "Using async UDF execution
is expensive (adds about 100us overhead per invocation on a Core-i7 MBPr)”
show that this is a known behavior.  My questions are as below:

1. What are the main pros and cons of these two methods? Can I find any documents that discuss

2. Are there any plans to improve the performance of using async UDF? A simple way come to
my mind is to use some sort of batch method, e.g., replace current row by row method with
some rows by some rows. Are there any concerns on this?

3. How people solve this performance issue in general? It seems this performance issue is
not an urgent or an important issue to solve because it is known and it is still there. Therefore
people must have some sort of good solution solving this issue. 

I really appreciate your comments in advance.

Best regards,


This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message