Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695DA200C6B for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:20:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 67FA8160BAE; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AEA9A160BAB for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:20:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3977 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2017 02:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 3966 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2017 02:20:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 52C36C057E for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXsx8otZN9RU for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id EE03060D89 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E0A42E0A31 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1CBD521B48 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "mck (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-13441) Schema version changes for each upgraded node in a rolling upgrade, causing migration storms MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:20:47 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15972009#comment-15972009 ] mck commented on CASSANDRA-13441: --------------------------------- {quote}Patch for trunk at: https://github.com/jeffjirsa/cassandra/tree/cassandra-13441{quote} Did you push the branch [~jjirsa] ? (i can't see any such branch in your fork) > Schema version changes for each upgraded node in a rolling upgrade, causing migration storms > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-13441 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13441 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Schema > Reporter: Jeff Jirsa > Assignee: Jeff Jirsa > Fix For: 4.x > > > In versions < 3.0, during a rolling upgrade (say 2.0 -> 2.1), the first node to upgrade to 2.1 would add the new tables, setting the new 2.1 version ID, and subsequently upgraded hosts would settle on that version. > When a 3.0 node upgrades and writes its own new-in-3.0 system tables, it'll write the same tables that exist in the schema with brand new timestamps. As written, this will cause all nodes in the cluster to change schema (to the version with the newest timestamp). On a sufficiently large cluster with a non-trivial schema, this could cause (literally) millions of migration tasks to needlessly bounce across the cluster. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)