Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:26:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Joshua McKenzie (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@cassandra.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12948464.1457544418000.25700.1466191565177@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12948464.1457544418000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12948464.1457544418000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.12948464.1457544418822@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-11327) Maintain a histogram of times
 when writes are blocked due to no available memory
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:26:07 -0000


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Joshua McKenzie updated CASSANDRA-11327:
----------------------------------------
    Status: Ready to Commit  (was: Patch Available)

> Maintain a histogram of times when writes are blocked due to no available memory
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11327
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
>            Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
>
> I have a theory that part of the reason C* is so sensitive to timeouts during saturating write load is that throughput is basically a sawtooth with valleys at zero. This is something I have observed and it gets worse as you add 2i to a table or do anything that decreases the throughput of flushing.
> I think the fix for this is to incrementally release memory pinned by memtables and 2i during flushing instead of releasing it all at once. I know that's not really possible, but we can fake it with memory accounting that tracks how close to completion flushing is and releases permits for additional memory. This will lead to a bit of a sawtooth in real memory usage, but we can account for that so the peak footprint is the same.
> I think the end result of this change will be a sawtooth, but the valley of the sawtooth will not be zero it will be the rate at which flushing progresses. Optimizing the rate at which flushing progresses and it's fairness with other work can then be tackled separately.
> Before we do this I think we should demonstrate that pinned memory due to flushing is actually the issue by getting better visibility into the distribution of instances of not having any memory by maintaining a histogram of spans of time where no memory is available and a thread is blocked.
> [MemtableAllocatr$SubPool.allocate(long)|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-3.0/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/utils/memory/MemtableAllocator.java#L186] should be a relatively straightforward entry point for this. The first thread to block can mark the start of memory starvation and the last thread out can mark the end. Have a periodic task that tracks the amount of time spent blocked per interval of time and if it is greater than some threshold log with more details, possibly at debug.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)