cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joshua McKenzie (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-11332) nodes connect to themselves when NTS is used
Date Tue, 03 May 2016 15:25:13 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Joshua McKenzie updated CASSANDRA-11332:
----------------------------------------
    Reviewer: Carl Yeksigian

> nodes connect to themselves when NTS is used
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11332
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11332
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Brandon Williams
>            Assignee: Branimir Lambov
>             Fix For: 2.1.x
>
>
> I tested this with both the simple snitch and PFS.  It's quite easy to repro, setup a
cluster, start it.  Mine looks like this:
> {noformat}
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:48003      10.208.8.63:7000        ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.8.63:40215       ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:55559      10.208.35.225:7000      ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:33498      10.208.8.63:7000        ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.35.225:52530     ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.35.225:53674     ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:40846      10.208.35.225:7000      ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.8.63:48880       ESTABLISHED 26254/java
> {noformat}
> No problems so far.  Now create a keyspace using NTS with an rf of 3, and perform some
writes.  Now it looks like this:
> {noformat}
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:48003      10.208.8.63:7000        ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.8.123:35024      ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:35024      10.208.8.123:7000       ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:47212      10.208.8.123:7000       ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.8.63:40215       ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:55559      10.208.35.225:7000      ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:33498      10.208.8.63:7000        ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.35.225:52530     ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.35.225:53674     ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.8.123:47212      ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:40846      10.208.35.225:7000      ESTABLISHED 26254/java
     
> tcp        0      0 10.208.8.123:7000       10.208.8.63:48880       ESTABLISHED 26254/java
 
> {noformat}
> I can't think of any reason for a node to connect to itself, and this can cause problems
with PFS where you might only define the broadcast addresses, but now you need the internal
addresses too because the node will need to look itself up when connecting to itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message