Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C00B619DA5 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79820 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2016 23:13:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 79786 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2016 23:13:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 79772 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2016 23:13:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:13:25 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761A42C1F5D for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:13:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nick Bailey (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11461) Failed incremental repairs never cleared from pending list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15219041#comment-15219041 ] Nick Bailey commented on CASSANDRA-11461: ----------------------------------------- Yeah. So OpsCenter lets you configure some tables for incremental repair and some for normal subrange repair, which is what was happening in this case. So OpsCenter is doing: * Break up the ring into small chunks for subrange repair * Visit a node and repair a small range for all tables that are using subrange repair * If any tables are configured for incremental repair, run an incremental repair on those tables ** By default this would do a full incremental repair on those tables, which is what was in use when this bug was hit * Jump across the ring to a different node and repeat the above process. It does all this in a single datacenter, since opscenter does cross dc repair. That's at least the very high level overview. > Failed incremental repairs never cleared from pending list > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-11461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11461 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Reporter: Adam Hattrell > > Set up a test cluster with 2 DC's, heavy use of LCS (not sure if that's relevant). > Kick off cassandra-stress against it. > Kick of an automated incremental repair cycle. > After a bit a node starts flapping which causes a few repairs to fail. This is never cleared out of pending repairs - given the keyspace is replicated to all nodes it means they all have pending repairs that will never complete. Repairs are basically blocked at this point. > Given we're using Incremental repairs you're now spammed with: > "Cannot start multiple repair sessions over the same sstables" > Cluster and logs are still available for review - message me for details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)