cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sam Tunnicliffe (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11067) Improve SASI syntax
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:56:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15118893#comment-15118893
] 

Sam Tunnicliffe commented on CASSANDRA-11067:
---------------------------------------------

bq. I think it would be great to SASI become the default implementation or to have an easier
way to specify which implementation to use
+1 I don't see a reason why the SASI integration wouldn't ultimately remove the "CUSTOM" demarcation.
That will require some minor-ish syntax changes and tweaks to validation of index metadata
etc but nothing seems overly problematic there.


> Improve SASI syntax
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11067
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: CQL
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Pavel Yaskevich
>             Fix For: 3.4
>
>
> I think everyone agrees that a LIKE operator would be ideal, but that's probably not
in scope for an initial 3.4 release.
> Still, I'm uncomfortable with the initial approach of overloading = to mean "satisfies
index expression."  The problem is that it will be very difficult to back out of this behavior
once people are using it.
> I propose adding a new operator in the interim instead.  Call it MATCHES, maybe.  With
the exact same behavior that SASI currently exposes, just with a separate operator rather
than being rolled into =.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message