cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Ferland (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-10979) LCS doesn't do L0 STC on new tables while an L0->L1 compaction is in progress
Date Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:24:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15088139#comment-15088139
] 

Jeff Ferland edited comment on CASSANDRA-10979 at 1/7/16 9:24 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

Debug logging using the current (unpatched) code: https://gist.github.com/autocracy/346afa253175af475770


was (Author: autocracy):
Debug logging using the current code: https://gist.github.com/autocracy/346afa253175af475770

> LCS doesn't do L0 STC on new tables while an L0->L1 compaction is in progress
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10979
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10979
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Compaction
>         Environment: 2.1.11 / 4.8.3 DSE.
>            Reporter: Jeff Ferland
>              Labels: compaction, leveled
>             Fix For: 2.1.x
>
>
> Reading code from https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-2.1/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/compaction/LeveledManifest.java
and comparing with behavior shown in https://gist.github.com/autocracy/c95aca6b00e42215daaf,
the following happens:
> Score for L1,L2,and L3 is all < 1 (paste shows 20/10 and 200/100, due to incremental
repair).
> Relevant code from here is
>     if (Sets.intersection(l1overlapping, compacting).size() > 0)
>         return Collections.emptyList();
> Since there will be overlap between what is compacting and L1 (in my case, pushing over
1,000 tables in to L1 from L0 SCTS), I get a pile up of 1,000 smaller tables in L0 while awaiting
the transition from L0 to L1 and destroy my performance.
> Requested outcome is to continue to perform SCTS on non-compacting L0 tables.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message