Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 19:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Ariel Weisberg (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@cassandra.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12904598.1444755777000.154784.1446665667745@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12904598.1444755777000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12904598.1444755777000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12904598.1444755777814@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10512) We do not save an upsampled
 index summaries
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14990240#comment-14990240 ] 

Ariel Weisberg commented on CASSANDRA-10512:
--------------------------------------------

Renamed, tests are running. 

> We do not save an upsampled index summaries
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10512
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10512
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
>             Fix For: 2.1.x, 2.2.x, 3.1
>
>
> If we downsample an index summary, we overwrite the existing summary, despite downsampling being inexpensive. However on upsampling (which is expensive) we do not, so that on restart all of our index summaries are the smallest they have ever been adjusted to.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)