Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F115185E6 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12711 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2015 14:48:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 12674 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2015 14:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 12659 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2015 14:48:28 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:48:28 +0000 Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:48:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Carl Yeksigian (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-9602) EACH_QUORUM READ support needed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carl Yeksigian updated CASSANDRA-9602: -------------------------------------- Labels: doc-impacting (was: client-impacting doc-impacting) > EACH_QUORUM READ support needed > ------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-9602 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9602 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Guminy > Assignee: Carl Yeksigian > Labels: doc-impacting > Fix For: 3.x > > > EACH_QUORUM consistency for READ should be added. > This bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3272 says it is not needed ever, however I have a use case where I need it. I think the decision made was incorrect. Here's why... > > My application has two key pieces: > > # *End user actions* which add/modify data in the system. End users typically access the application from only one Data Center and only see their own data > # *Scheduled business logic tasks* which run from any node in any data center. These tasks process data added by the end users in an asynchronous way > > *End user actions must have the highest degree of availability.* Users must always be able to add data to the system. The data will be processed later. To support this, end user actions will use *LOCAL_QUORUM Read and Write Consistency*. > > Scheduled tasks don't need to have a high degree of availability but MUST operate on the most up to date data. *The tasks will run with EACH_QUORUM* to ensure that no matter how many data centers we have, we always READ the latest data. This approach allows us some amount of fault tolerance. > > The problem is that EACH_QUORUM is not a valid READ consistency level. This mean I have no alternative but to use ALL. ALL will work, but is not the best since it offers support for ZERO failures. I would prefer EACH_QUORUM since it can support some failures in each data center. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)