cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10365) Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified internal class names
Date Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:55:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14980788#comment-14980788
] 

Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
-----------------------------------------------

bq. That made realize however that I wasn't sure if UDT were actually usable with CQLSSTableWriter
at all, and how if they are. Do you know more?

They weren't usable before, and I do not really care to fix it in this ticket, so I just retained
the current behavior.

> Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified
internal class names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>              Labels: client-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return types, and UDT
components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message