cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Holmberg (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10365) Store types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified internal class names
Date Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:51:28 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14982736#comment-14982736
] 

Adam Holmberg commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
-------------------------------------------

[~snazy] your branch does not build presently. I was working with a tweak to get it building.
I'm noticing some possible bugs around aggregates (not sure if it's because of my incorrect
tweak, or something else).
https://gist.github.com/aholmberg/33a19b559e1a3bd003e3

Are you still working this?

> Store types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified internal class
names
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>              Labels: client-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return types, and UDT
components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message