cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joshua McKenzie (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10403) Consider reverting to CMS GC on 3.0
Date Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:17:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14933598#comment-14933598
] 

Joshua McKenzie commented on CASSANDRA-10403:
---------------------------------------------

To me, the long-term solution of C* having the intelligence to select G1 for heaps over X,
CMS for heaps under X makes a lot of sense, assuming test data shows that to be the appropriate
solution.

I'd argue that what we need to do here is figure out what the sanest recommendation is for
a default GC on 3.0, get that setup in our launch scripts (if necessary), and probably include
the alternate set of GC configurations in our launch files, commented out, so people can easily
swap back and forth based on their needs.

> Consider reverting to CMS GC on 3.0
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10403
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Config
>            Reporter: Joshua McKenzie
>             Fix For: 3.0.0 rc2
>
>
> Reference discussion on CASSANDRA-7486.
> For smaller heap sizes G1 appears to have some throughput/latency issues when compared
to CMS. With our default max heap size at 8G on 3.0, there's a strong argument to be made
for having CMS as the default for the 3.0 release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message