cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Stupp (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10365) Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified internal class names
Date Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:50:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14803295#comment-14803295
] 

Robert Stupp commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
------------------------------------------

I'd appreciate this very much as we "convert" a lot between CQL types and _AbstractType_.
IMO we have to do this anyway in the (more or less) near future - and this (as schema tables
are changed for 3.0) is a good chance to do it.
As soon as AbstractType is no longer used in the schema tables, we are free to "streamline"
the code and remove AbstractType completely (as soon as Thrift is gone).

> Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified
internal class names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>              Labels: client-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.0.x
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return types, and UDT
components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message