cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Holmberg (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9921) Combine MV schema definition with MV table definition
Date Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:13:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14741543#comment-14741543
] 

Adam Holmberg commented on CASSANDRA-9921:
------------------------------------------

Would it be feasible to include {{base_table_name}} in the view metadata? Not having that
adds complexity to clients because nothing is indexed using {{base_table_id}}.

> Combine MV schema definition with MV table definition
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9921
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9921
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Carl Yeksigian
>            Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
>              Labels: client-impacting, materializedviews
>             Fix For: 3.0.0 rc1
>
>         Attachments: 9921-unit-test.txt
>
>
> Prevent MV from reusing {{system_schema.tables}} and instead move those properties into
the {{system_schema.materializedviews}} table to keep them separate entities.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message