cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9742) Nodetool verify
Date Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:09:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14617697#comment-14617697
] 

Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-9742:
----------------------------------------------

I still disagree, but not strongly enough to argue. Hints checksums weaken the argument for
a single command somewhat, but maybe we just want a separate command for hints (or just not
care about them at all for now).

> Nodetool verify
> ---------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9742
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9742
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> We introduced incremental repair in 2.1 but it is difficult to make that the default
without unpleasant surprises for incautious users.
> Additionally, while we now store sstable checksums, we leave verification to the user.
> I propose introducing a new command, {{nodetool verify}}, that would address both of
these.
> Default operation would be to do an incremental repair, plus validate checksums on *all*
sstables (not just unrepaired ones).  We could also have --local mode (checksums only) and
--full (classic repair).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message