cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ariel Weisberg (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9102) Consistency levels such as non-local quorum need better tests
Date Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:10:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14617109#comment-14617109
] 

Ariel Weisberg commented on CASSANDRA-9102:
-------------------------------------------

That coverage information is very helpful. Do you happen to have a hash for the version you
generated the coverage for?

I think a side channel like JMX or a property would work. Slightly more flexible might be
to be able to annotate the request to indicate that the request wants some specific kind of
failure injection. We already have support for tacking stuff onto requests for tracing. Maybe
that can be adapted?

I think completing the coverage of storage proxy is something should be scoped in a separate
ticket.


> Consistency levels such as non-local quorum need better tests
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9102
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
>            Assignee: Stefania
>         Attachments: jacoco.diff, jacoco.tar.gz
>
>
> We didn't catch unit testing for this functionality. There is dtest consistency_test
but it doesn't cover non-local functionality.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message