Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 06:08:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Stefania (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@cassandra.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12787735.1427994051000.24895.1433830081065@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12787735.1427994051000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12787735.1427994051000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12787735.1427994051335@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9102) Consistency levels such as
 non-local quorum need better tests
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14578381#comment-14578381 ] 

Stefania commented on CASSANDRA-9102:
-------------------------------------

Thanks for the input. 

I will try and devise a test that sends different data to different hosts and checks the results we get back are consistent with the read and write consistency levels, exercising tombstones as well. To avoid overlap, may I have more details on the planned tests for the validation harness?


> Consistency levels such as non-local quorum need better tests
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9102
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
>            Assignee: Stefania
>
> We didn't catch unit testing for this functionality. There is dtest consistency_test but it doesn't cover non-local functionality.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)