cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9420) Table option for promising that you will never touch a column twice
Date Mon, 18 May 2015 22:08:01 GMT


Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-9420:

We've discussed this before, when introducing default TTL.

What we should have done back then was to make that option not a default, but an enforced
constrain. So that *every* update/insert always comes with the same TTL.

I personally wouldn't mind adding a new {{required_ttl}} table option and have it behave like

> Table option for promising that you will never touch a column twice
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9420
>                 URL:
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Björn Hegerfors
> There are time series use cases where you write all values with various TTLs, have GC
grace = 0 and never ever update or delete a column after insertion. In the case where all
TTLs are the same, DTCS with recent patches works great. But when there is lots of variations
in TTLs, you are forced to choose between splitting your table into multiple TTL tiers or
having your SSTables filled to the majority with tombstones. Or running frequent major compactions.
> The problem stems from the fact that Cassandra plays safe when a TTL has expired, and
turns it into a tombstone, rather than getting rid of it on the spot. The reason is that this
TTL _may_ have been in a column which has had an earlier write without (or with a higher)
TTL. And then that one should now be deleted too.
> I propose that there should be table level setting to say "I guarantee that there will
never be any updates to any columns". The effect of enabling that option is that all tombstones
and expired TTLs should always be immediately removed during compaction. And the check for
dropping entirely expired SSTables can be very loosened for these tables.
> This option should probably require gc_grace_seconds to be set to zero. It's also questionable
if writes without TTL should be allowed to such a table, since those would become constants.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message