cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jon Haddad (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-6477) Materialized Views (was: Global Indexes)
Date Mon, 18 May 2015 21:20:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14549094#comment-14549094
] 

Jon Haddad edited comment on CASSANDRA-6477 at 5/18/15 9:19 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Not a fan of materialized query tables personally.  We frequently refer to the various tables
that people need to create to query their data as materialized views, and people seem to understand
immediately.


was (Author: rustyrazorblade):
Not a fan of materialized query tables personally.  

To put it in context, we frequently refer to the various tables that people need to create
to query their data as materialized views, and people seem to understand immediately.

> Materialized Views (was: Global Indexes)
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: API, Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
>              Labels: cql
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Local indexes are suitable for low-cardinality data, where spreading the index across
the cluster is a Good Thing.  However, for high-cardinality data, local indexes require querying
most nodes in the cluster even if only a handful of rows is returned.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message