Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15A8317469 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72833 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2015 12:54:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 72796 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2015 12:54:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 72785 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2015 12:54:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:54:58 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tommy Stendahl (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9203) Removing cold_reads_to_omit is not backwards compatible MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14498012#comment-14498012 ] Tommy Stendahl commented on CASSANDRA-9203: ------------------------------------------- Attached a patch that handles this. > Removing cold_reads_to_omit is not backwards compatible > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-9203 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9203 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: cassandra-2.1.5-tentative > Reporter: Tommy Stendahl > Attachments: 9203.txt > > > While doing some tests on cassandra-2.1.5-tentative I found the cold_reads_to_omit parameter in SizeTieredCompactionStrategy was removed, this breaks our CREATE TABLE statements. This was done in CASSANDRA-8860 and if I understand Marcus comment in that JIRA, the intention was to keep the parameter in 2.1 but ignore it to avoid breaking existing code. But the patch actually removes the parameter. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)