Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8632610F4E for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 07:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33153 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2014 07:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 33117 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2014 07:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 33106 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2014 07:13:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:13:13 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 07:13:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-8371) DateTieredCompactionStrategy is always compacting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8371?page=3Dcom.atlas= sian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D= 14229481#comment-14229481 ]=20 Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-8371: ------------------------------------------- bq. Could we make it a string, and allow suffixes 'hours', 'days', 'weeks',= 'years', but just assume 'days' if not specified? Not really a fan since we named the option _days already. :-| > DateTieredCompactionStrategy is always compacting=20 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-8371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8371 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Reporter: mck > Assignee: Bj=C3=B6rn Hegerfors > Labels: compaction, performance > Attachments: java_gc_counts_rate-month.png, read-latency-recommen= ders-adview.png, read-latency.png, sstables-recommenders-adviews.png, sstab= les.png, vg2_iad-month.png > > > Running 2.0.11 and having switched a table to [DTCS|https://issues.apache= .org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6602] we've seen that disk IO and gc count incre= ase, along with the number of reads happening in the "compaction" hump of c= fhistograms. > Data, and generally performance, looks good, but compactions are always h= appening, and pending compactions are building up. > The schema for this is=20 > {code}CREATE TABLE search ( > loginid text, > searchid timeuuid, > description text, > searchkey text, > searchurl text, > PRIMARY KEY ((loginid), searchid) > );{code} > We're sitting on about 82G (per replica) across 6 nodes in 4 DCs. > CQL executed against this keyspace, and traffic patterns, can be seen in = slides 7+8 of https://prezi.com/b9-aj6p2esft/ > Attached are sstables-per-read and read-latency graphs from cfhistograms,= and screenshots of our munin graphs as we have gone from STCS, to LCS (wee= k ~44), to DTCS (week ~46). > These screenshots are also found in the prezi on slides 9-11. > [~pmcfadin], [~Bj0rn],=20 > Can this be a consequence of occasional deleted rows, as is described und= er (3) in the description of CASSANDRA-6602 ? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)