Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 469DD11B90 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85142 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2014 09:26:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 85107 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2014 09:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 85098 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2014 09:26:38 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:26:38 +0000 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:26:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benedict (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-7139) Default concurrent_compactors is probably too high MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14004524#comment-14004524 ] Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-7139: ------------------------------------- LGTM, +1 > Default concurrent_compactors is probably too high > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-7139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7139 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Reporter: Benedict > Assignee: Jonathan Ellis > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.1 rc1 > > Attachments: 7139.txt > > > The default number of concurrent compactors is probably too high for modern hardware with spinning disks for storage: A modern blade can easily have 24+ Cores, which would result in a default of 24 concurrent compactions. This not only increases random IO, it also keeps around a lot of obsoleted files for an unnecessarily long time, as each compaction keeps references to any possibly overlapping files that it isn't itself compacting - but these can have been obsoleted part way through by compactions that finished earlier. If you factor in the default compaction throughput rate of 16Mb/s, anything but a single default concurrent_compactor makes very little sense, as a single thread should always be able to handle 16Mb/s, will cause less interference with other processes, and permits obsoleted files to be immediately removed. > See [http://imgur.com/HDqhxFp] for a graph demonstrating the result of making this change on a box with 24-cores and 8Tb of storage (first spike is default settings) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)