cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sylvain Lebresne (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-7123) BATCH documentation should be explicit about ordering guarantees
Date Thu, 01 May 2014 17:45:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13986805#comment-13986805
] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-7123:
---------------------------------------------

If you make "timestamp ties" link to http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#clocktie (I see
no reason to hide details provided we properly guard against misuse of such details, which
this FAQ does), you have my +1.

> BATCH documentation should be explicit about ordering guarantees
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7123
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7123
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Documentation & website
>            Reporter: Tyler Hobbs
>            Assignee: Tyler Hobbs
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 7123-v2.txt, 7123.txt
>
>
> In the CQL3 [batch statement documentation](http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/cql3/CQL.html#batchStmt)
we don't mention that there are no ordering guarantees, which can lead to somewhat surprising
behavior (CASSANDRA-6291).
> We should also mention that you could specify timestamps in order to achieve a particular
ordering.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message