Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07D8A10F97 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15439 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2014 13:45:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 14501 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2014 13:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 14467 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2014 13:45:44 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:45:44 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:45:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-6506) counters++ split counter context shards into separate cells MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13945099#comment-13945099 ] Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-6506: ---------------------------------------------- That's one of the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 - in 2.0 we localCopy() first, then reconcile(), and thus have to use the same allocator all the way, but in 2.1 we reconcile() first, and localCopy() the result. > counters++ split counter context shards into separate cells > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-6506 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6506 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko > Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko > Fix For: 2.1 beta2 > > > This change is related to, but somewhat orthogonal to CASSANDRA-6504. > Currently all the shard tuples for a given counter cell are packed, in sorted order, in one binary blob. Thus reconciling N counter cells requires allocating a new byte buffer capable of holding the union of the two context's shards N-1 times. > For writes, in post CASSANDRA-6504 world, it also means reading more data than we have to (the complete context, when all we need is the local node's global shard). > Splitting the context into separate cells, one cell per shard, will help to improve this. We did a similar thing with super columns for CASSANDRA-3237. Incidentally, doing this split is now possible thanks to CASSANDRA-3237. > Doing this would also simplify counter reconciliation logic. Getting rid of old contexts altogether can be done trivially with upgradesstables. > In fact, we should be able to put the logical clock into the cell's timestamp, and use regular Cell-s and regular Cell reconcile() logic for the shards, especially once we get rid of the local/remote shards some time in the future (until then we still have to differentiate between global/remote/local shards and their priority rules). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)