cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus Eriksson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-6922) Investigate if we can drop ByteOrderedPartitioner and OrderPreservingPartitioner in 3.0
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:11:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946655#comment-13946655
] 

Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-6922:
--------------------------------------------

Biggest benefit is that we avoid having code around that we don't think anyone should use.

Not a big deal, but reducing the amount of configuration choices for operators is a good thing.

> Investigate if we can drop ByteOrderedPartitioner and OrderPreservingPartitioner in 3.0
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6922
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6922
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> We would need to add deprecation warnings in 2.1, rewrite a lot of unit tests, and perhaps
provide tools/guidelines to migrate an existing data set to Murmur3Partitioner.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message