Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@cassandra.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12677408.1383584881781.52439.1384193358033@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12677408.1383584881781@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12677408.1383584881781@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-6296) Bootstrapping a new node should
 not require much compaction when leveled compaction is used
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13819165#comment-13819165 ] 

T Jake Luciani commented on CASSANDRA-6296:
-------------------------------------------

But does it stream the same range from multiple replicas? or does it fetch different ranges?  If it's the former then this would still work with leveled, since there would be no overlap.

> Bootstrapping a new node should not require much compaction when leveled compaction is used
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6296
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: T Jake Luciani
>            Priority: Minor
>
> boostrapping a new node currently requires recompacting all data.  In the case of leveled compaction we already have the data in non-overlapping levels. Since we stream from a single host for a single range this shouldn't require any compaction if the sstable is > level 0


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)