Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73165101BA for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 02:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91962 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2013 02:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 91926 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2013 02:46:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 91910 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2013 02:46:51 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 02:46:51 +0000 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 02:46:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vijay (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-5933) 2.0 read performance is slower than 1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13756323#comment-13756323 ] Vijay commented on CASSANDRA-5933: ---------------------------------- Ryan, Do you mind testing the custom with 5 to 10 ms... I am thinking, we might need enough sample for Percentiles to make more sense (if conformed we might want to wait till the samples arrive etc). > 2.0 read performance is slower than 1.2 > --------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-5933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5933 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ryan McGuire > Attachments: 1.2-faster-than-2.0.png, 1.2-faster-than-2.0-stats.png > > > Over the course of several tests I have observed that 2.0 read performance is noticeably slower than 1.2 > Example: > Blue line is 1.2, the rest are various forms of 2.0 rc1 (I've also seen this on rc2, just don't have a good graph handy) > !1.2-faster-than-2.0.png! > !1.2-faster-than-2.0-stats.png! > [See test data here|http://ryanmcguire.info/ds/graph/graph.html?stats=stats.eager_retry.node_killed.json&metric=interval_op_rate&operation=stress-read&smoothing=1] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira