cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-5302) Fix nodetool ring and status output format for IPv6 addresses
Date Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:35:13 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-5302:
--------------------------------------

    Reviewer: brandon.williams
    
> Fix nodetool ring and status output format for IPv6 addresses
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-5302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5302
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Michał Michalski
>            Assignee: Michał Michalski
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: 5302.patch
>
>
> My pedantic nature can't stand having unaligned columns in nodetool outputs, which happens
when IP addresses are IPv6 ones:
> {noformat}michal@aperture$ nodetool -h myhost status
> Datacenter: DC1
> ==================
> Status=Up/Down
> |/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving
> --  Address           Load       Owns (effective)  Host ID                          
    Token                                    Rack
> UN  2001:3c27:21:166:0:1:2:7  331.65 GB  100,0%            d557fb83-72f2-4e92-9f26-de6c788aada5
 85070591730234615865843651857942052864   rack2
> UN  2001:3c27:21:166:0:1:1:7  328.8 GB   100,0%            0461a4bf-97a6-447d-9d06-3b42ad1f702c
 0                                        rack1
> {noformat}
> I'm attaching a patch that fixes this problem for nodetool status / ring commands. It
does it by picking first item in nodes list (for nodetool ring it's first node in general,
for nodetool status it's first node in each DC) and uses its length as a field length for
output.
> It bases on assumptions that it's imppossible to have 0 nodes in cluster/DC and the lenghts
of addresses are equal. Let me know if there's the case when it's not valid.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message