cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vijay (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-4858) Coverage analysis for low-CL queries
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:58:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13552989#comment-13552989
] 

Vijay commented on CASSANDRA-4858:
----------------------------------

{quote}
'twice' here is a bit random and might not be appropriate
{quote}
Can we use dynamic_snitch_badness_threshold or add something similar instead?
                
> Coverage analysis for low-CL queries
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4858
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4858
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Vijay
>             Fix For: 1.2.1
>
>         Attachments: 0001-CASSANDRA-4858.patch, 0001-CASSANDRA-4858-v2.patch, 4858-v3-1.txt,
4858-v3-2.txt
>
>
> There are many cases where getRangeSlice creates more
> RangeSliceCommand than it should, because it always creates one for each range
> returned by getRestrictedRange.  Especially for CL.ONE this does not take
> the replication factor into account and is potentially pretty wasteful.
> A range slice at CL.ONE on a 3 node cluster with RF=3 should only
> ever create one RangeSliceCommand.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message