Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9188BD04C for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16876 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2012 16:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 16835 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2012 16:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 16796 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2012 16:00:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:00:58 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:00:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Message-ID: <1644960679.3177.1353340858217.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> In-Reply-To: <1027293777.42669.1351568892551.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-4874) Possible authorizaton handling impovements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500327#comment-13500327 ] Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-4874: ---------------------------------------------- It's a meta-permission really (permission to grant permissions). It just doesn't belong there. > Possible authorizaton handling impovements > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: CASSANDRA-4874 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4874 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 1.1.6, 1.2.0 beta 1 > Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko > Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko > Labels: security > Fix For: 1.2.0 rc1 > > Attachments: 4874-4875.txt, 4874-v2.txt, 4874-v3.txt, v1-v2.diff > > > I'll create another issue with my suggestions about fixing/improving IAuthority interfaces. This one lists possible improvements that aren't related to grant/revoke methods. > Inconsistencies: > - CREATE COLUMNFAMILY: P.CREATE on the KS in CQL2 vs. P.CREATE on the CF in CQL3 and Thrift > - BATCH: P.UPDATE or P.DELETE on CF in CQL2 vs. P.UPDATE in CQL3 and Thrift (despite remove* in Thrift asking for P.DELETE) > - DELETE: P.DELETE in CQL2 and Thrift vs. P.UPDATE in CQL3 > - DROP INDEX: no checks in CQL2 vs. P.ALTER on the CF in CQL3 > Other issues/suggestions > - CQL2 DROP INDEX should require authorization > - current permission checks are inconsistent since they are performed separately by CQL2 query processor, Thrift CassandraServer and CQL3 statement classes. > We should move it to one place. SomeClassWithABetterName.authorize(Operation, KS, CF, User), where operation would be a enum > (ALTER_KEYSPACE, ALTER_TABLE, CREATE_TABLE, CREATE, USE, UPDATE etc.), CF should be nullable. > - we don't respect the hierarchy when checking for permissions, or, to be more specific, we are doing it wrong. take CQL3 INSERT as an example: > we require P.UPDATE on the CF or FULL_ACCESS on either KS or CF. However, having P.UPDATE on the KS won't allow you to perform the statement, only FULL_ACCESS will do. > I doubt this was intentional, and if it was, I say it's wrong. P.UPDATE on the KS should allow you to do updates on KS's cfs. > Examples in http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/dynamic-permission-allocation-in-cassandra-1-1 point to it being a bug, since REVOKE UPDATE ON ks FROM omega is there. > - currently we lack a way to set permission on cassandra/keyspaces resource. I think we should be able to do it. See the following point on why. > - currently to create a keyspace you must have a P.CREATE permission on that keyspace THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST YET. So only a superuser can create a keyspace, > or a superuser must first grant you a permission to create it. Which doesn't look right to me. P.CREATE on cassandra/keyspaces should allow you to create new > keyspaces without an explicit permission for each of them. > - same goes for CREATE TABLE. you need P.CREATE on that not-yet-existing CF of FULL_ACCESS on the whole KS. P.CREATE on the KS won't do. this is wrong. > - since permissions don't map directly to statements, we should describe clearly in the documentation what permissions are required by what cql statement/thrift method. > Full list of current permission requirements: https://gist.github.com/3978182 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira