cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brandon Williams (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-4839) Online toggle for node write-only status
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:49:23 GMT


Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-4839:

bq. I think it would be something like wait N seconds on boot to receive hints, and then wait
until any in-progress hint deliveries finished or timed out before taking reads. It doesn't
have to be perfect, but would significantly increase the consistency of CL.ONE reads during
reboots, which along with the other tickets that cover faster table loading, would promote
more productive restarts – think tuning and minor upgrades for both C* and the JVM.

That sounds like a reasonable solution if it's configurable.

bq. Either way, I think that automatically doing that would be great but isn't coupled to
the original idea. Just getting the ability to do this from JMX would be great.

I actually like your first idea better than a JMX method that does spooky things :)
> Online toggle for node write-only status
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4839
>                 URL:
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Rick Branson
>            Priority: Minor
> It would be really great if users could disable/enable reads on a given node, while still
allowing write operations to take place. This would be similar to how we enable/disable thrift
and gossip using JMX.
> The scenario for using this is that often a node needs to be brought down for maintenance
for a few minutes, and while the node is catching up from hints, which can take 10-30 minutes
depending on write load, it will serve stale data. Do the math for a rolling restart of a
large cluster and you have potential windows of hours or days where a large amount of inconsistency
is surfacing.
> Avoiding this large time gap of inconsistency during regular maintenance alleviates concerns
about inconsistent data surfaced to users during normal, planned activities. While a read
consistency >ONE can indeed be used to prevent any inconsistency from the scenario above,
it seems ridiculous to always incur the cost to cover the 0.1% case.
> In addition, it would open up the ability for a node to (optionally) automatically "go
dark" for reads while it's receiving hints after joining the cluster or perhaps during repair.
These obviously have their own complications and justify separate tickets.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message