cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brandon Williams (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-2893) Add row-level isolation
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:51:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13174558#comment-13174558
] 

Brandon Williams edited comment on CASSANDRA-2893 at 12/22/11 1:50 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe a chart isn't the best way to look at this.  First, let me note that I mislabeled the
X axis, this is _micro_seconds since I measured from cfhistograms to avoid any network interference,
so the differences are smaller than I originally implied (and may explain the throughput similarity
since network latency would dominate.)

Let's look at this statistically (as derived from the histogram data) instead.

h4. Non-contended
||type||trunk||2893||
|Mean|9.0105|9.5486|
|SD|7.5795|7.6594|
|10th %|5|5|
|25th %|6|7|
|50th %|8|8|
|75th %|10|10|
|95th %|42|42|
|99th %|103|103|

h4. Contended
||type||trunk||2893||
|Mean|10.2212|14.9205|
|SD|8.1631|11.7420|
|10th %|6|8|
|25th %|7|10|
|50th %|8|12|
|75th %|12|17|
|95th %|42|72|
|99th %|103|124|

Non-contended is almost exactly the same in every way.  Things begin to differ with a contended
row, but nothing I would call twice as bad.
                
      was (Author: brandon.williams):
    Maybe a chart isn't the best way to look at this.  First, let me note that I mislabeled
the X axis, this is _micro_seconds since I measured from cfhistograms to avoid any network
interference, so the differences are smaller than I originally implied (and may explain the
throughput similarity since network latency would dominate.)

Let's look at this statistically (as derived from the histogram data) instead.

h4. Non-contended
||type||trunk||2893||
|Mean|9.0105|9.0113|
|SD|7.5795|7.6782|
|10th %|5|5|
|25th %|6|7|
|50th %|8|8|
|75th %|10|10|
|95th %|42|42|
|99th %|103|103|

h4. Contended
||type||trunk||2893||
|Mean|10.2212|10.2820|
|SD|8.1631|12.6250|
|10th %|6|8|
|25th %|7|10|
|50th %|8|12|
|75th %|12|17|
|95th %|42|72|
|99th %|103|124|

Non-contended is almost exactly the same in every way.  Things begin to differ with a contended
row, but nothing I would call twice as bad.
                  
> Add row-level isolation
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2893
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Move-deletion-infos-into-ISortedColumns-v2.patch, 0001-Move-deletion-infos-into-ISortedColumns.patch,
0002-Make-memtable-use-CF.addAll-v2.patch, 0002-Make-memtable-use-CF.addAll.patch, 0003-Add-AtomicSortedColumn-and-snapTree-v2.patch,
0003-Add-AtomicSortedColumn-and-snapTree.patch, latency-plain.svg, latency.svg, snaptree-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
>
> This could be done using an the atomic ConcurrentMap operations from the Memtable and
something like http://code.google.com/p/pcollections/ to replace the ConcurrentSkipListMap
in ThreadSafeSortedColumns.  The trick is that pcollections does not provide a SortedMap,
so we probably need to write our own.
> Googling [persistent sortedmap] I found http://code.google.com/p/actord/source/browse/trunk/actord/src/main/scala/ff/collection
(in scala) and http://clojure.org/data_structures#Data Structures-Maps.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message