cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
Date Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:22:29 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13091296#comment-13091296
] 

Hudson commented on CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------

Integrated in Cassandra-0.8 #295 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Cassandra-0.8/295/])
    clarify index_interval explanation
patch by mdennis for CASSANDRA-3074

jbellis : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1161701
Files : 
* /cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8/conf/cassandra.yaml


> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3074
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
>            Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.8.5
>
>         Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading.  They state the larger
the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space.  This is true, but in
the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger
the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message