cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (CASSANDRA-1954) Double-check or replace RRW memtable lock
Date Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:28:30 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Jonathan Ellis resolved CASSANDRA-1954.
---------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

committed

> Double-check or replace RRW memtable lock
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1954
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Stu Hood
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.8
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Double-check-in-maybeSwitchMemtable-to-minimize-writeL.txt,
0001-Remove-flusherLock-readLock.patch, 1954-0.7-v2.txt, 1954-v2.txt, 1954_trunk.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 8h
>  Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> {quote}...when a Memtable reaches its threshold, up to (all) N write threads will often
notice, and race to acquire the writeLock in order to freeze the memtable. This means that
we do way more writeLock acquisitions than we need to...{quote}
> See CASSANDRA-1930 for backstory, but adding double checking inside a read lock before
trying to re-entrantly acquire the writelock would eliminate most of these excess writelock
acquisitions.
> Alternatively, we should explore removing locking from these structures entirely, and
replacing the writeLock acquisition with a per-memtable counter of active threads.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message