Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Message-ID: <32782355.149381280881940225.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:32:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (CASSANDRA-1269) improve test coverage of
 BufferedRandomAccessFile
In-Reply-To: <25485504.317951278889491386.JavaMail.jira@thor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895105#action_12895105 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-1269:
-------------------------------------------

Can you clarify what you mean by that last?  Personally, I want to be confident that errors at the storage layer are from regressions in our sstable logic, rather than BRAF (which I made some pretty large change to during 0.7).  So, we're trying to test "everything." 100% line coverage is a reasonable approximation to that.


> improve test coverage of BufferedRandomAccessFile
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1269
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Jon Hermes
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: 1269.txt
>
>
> We have a BRAFTest but it doesn't do a whole lot.  Seems like we ought to be able to get to 100% line-based coverage w/ white-box testing.  http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute has instructions for setting up code coverage.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.