cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CASSANDRA-1269) improve test coverage of BufferedRandomAccessFile
Date Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:32:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895105#action_12895105
] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-1269:
-------------------------------------------

Can you clarify what you mean by that last?  Personally, I want to be confident that errors
at the storage layer are from regressions in our sstable logic, rather than BRAF (which I
made some pretty large change to during 0.7).  So, we're trying to test "everything." 100%
line coverage is a reasonable approximation to that.


> improve test coverage of BufferedRandomAccessFile
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1269
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Jon Hermes
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: 1269.txt
>
>
> We have a BRAFTest but it doesn't do a whole lot.  Seems like we ought to be able to
get to 100% line-based coverage w/ white-box testing.  http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute
has instructions for setting up code coverage.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message