Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75161 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 21:11:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 21:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 27031 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 21:11:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-commits-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 27013 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 21:11:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 27005 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 21:11:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:11:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1137.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:11:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22705234C4E9 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <880316951.497421269551487126.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:11:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Johan Oskarsson (JIRA)" To: commits@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (CASSANDRA-850) Ant release target doesn't include all jars in binary tarball MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849903#action_12849903 ] Johan Oskarsson commented on CASSANDRA-850: ------------------------------------------- +1, looks good to me. Couple of thoughts: * Is there a reason to keep the junit 3.8.1 jar in lib and also use ivy to fetch junit 4.6? * Due to my lack of legal expertise I will assume the bits in the notice file are sufficient. * I remember someone voiced the opinion earlier that licenses should be pulled into a single file in the root, can't remember which of license/notice it was. Personally I think that this approach with one license file per jar approach is much more user friendly and surely it must be as valid from a legal standpoint? > Ant release target doesn't include all jars in binary tarball > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-850 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-850 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 0.6 > Reporter: Johan Oskarsson > Assignee: Johan Oskarsson > Fix For: 0.6 > > Attachments: CASSANDRA-850.patch, v2-0001-CASSANDRA-850-runtime-dependencies-formerly-handled-by.txt, v2-0002-licensing-and-attribution-for-newly-added-jars.txt, v2-0003-remove-default-runtime-ivy-config.txt, v2-0004-remove-build-lib-jars-from-runtime-search-paths.txt, v2-0005-do-not-ship-build.xml-and-ivy.xml-in-binary-dist.txt, v2-0006-update-release-notes-and-readme-for-ivy-rollback.txt > > > The ant release target doesn't create a complete tarball, the jars in build/lib/jars are not included. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.