cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stu Hood (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (CASSANDRA-762) Load balancing does not account for the load of the moving node
Date Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:21:27 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Stu Hood updated CASSANDRA-762:
-------------------------------

    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

> Load balancing does not account for the load of the moving node
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-762
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.5
>            Reporter: Stu Hood
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Given a node A (with load 10 gb) and a node B (with load 20 gb), running the loadbalance
command against node A will:
> 1. Remove node A from the ring
>   * Recalculates pending ranges so that node B is responsible for the entire ring
> 2. Pick the most loaded node
>   * node B is still reporting 20 gb load, because that is all it has locally
> 3. Choose a token that divides the range of the most loaded node in half
> Since the token calculation doesn't take into account the load that node B is 'inheriting'
from node A, the token will divide node B's load in half and swap the loads. Instead, the
token calculation needs to pretend that B has already inherited the 10 gb from node A, for
a total of 30 gb. The token that should be chosen falls at 15 gb of the total load, or 5 gb
into node B's load.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message