Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-commits-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68214 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2010 13:47:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2010 13:47:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 92674 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 13:47:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-commits-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92643 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 13:47:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-commits-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-commits@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92408 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2010 13:47:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:47:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:47:14 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9833C234C4B1 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:46:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1725994022.394681264081614622.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:46:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jaakko Laine (JIRA)" To: cassandra-commits@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (CASSANDRA-698) ClusterProbe In-Reply-To: <209322085.229411263431814440.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803288#action_12803288 ] Jaakko Laine commented on CASSANDRA-698: ---------------------------------------- Yep, having things separated is good. Just thinking whether having two tools for related things is good or bad in the end. Many commands are "obviously" either node or cluster specific, but some are not. removetoken for instance affects the whole cluster but it is in nodeprobe. If there are two tools for related things, some admins are going to curse us when they have to remember which one to use for particular task :-) But we can have two tools, not a problem for me. > ClusterProbe > ------------ > > Key: CASSANDRA-698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-698 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Tools > Reporter: Chris Goffinet > Assignee: Chris Goffinet > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.7 > > Attachments: 0001-Added-ClusterProbe.-Supports-get_endpoints-key.patch, v3-0001-CASSANDRA-698-NodeProbe-refactor-move-main-to-new-clas.txt, v3-0002-NodeProbe-refactor-move-print-methods-to-new-class.txt, v3-0003-add-new-getEndPoints-method.txt, v3-0004-add-clustercmd-tool-currently-only-prints-endpoints.txt > > > I'd like to introduce ClusterProbe, for situations where you want to find information at cluster level. The first operation is get_endpoints, where you can supply a key. I want to also add support for showing hit ratio for column families at cluster level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.